Re: Day and month name localization uses wrong

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Day and month name localization uses wrong
Date: 2006-11-27 19:46:53
Message-ID: 200611271946.kARJkrq25022@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > It looks like we have some of the variants marked stable already for
> > their dependence on TimeZone, but the dependence on lc_messages is new.
>
> Actually, now that I look at it, *most* of the variants of to_char,
> to_number, and friends have been broken on this score since day one.
> There's been a dependency on LC_NUMERIC for the numeric variants all
> along, but they're marked immutable :-(

Where are we on this? Should I mark to_char as stable? Seems this
would break pre-8.2 to_char expression indexes. Do we need something in
the release notes for this?

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dennis Bjorklund 2006-11-27 19:47:27 Re: Potential to_char localization bug
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-11-27 19:42:33 Re: PrivateRefCount (for 8.3)