Re: availability of SATA vendors

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
To: Bucky Jordan <bjordan(at)lumeta(dot)com>
Cc: jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: availability of SATA vendors
Date: 2006-11-26 23:33:48
Message-ID: 20061126233348.GF39519@nasby.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 04:35:37PM -0500, Bucky Jordan wrote:
> While I'm at it, if I have time I'll run pgbench with pg_log on a
> separate RAID1, and one with it on a RAID10x6, but I don't know how
> useful those results will be.

Very, but only if the controller has write-caching enabled. For testing
purposes it won't batter if it's actually got a BBU so long as the write
cache works (of course you wouldn't run in production like that...)
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-11-26 23:41:02 Re: Postgres server crash
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-11-26 23:30:56 Re: availability of SATA vendors