Re: [CORE] RC1 blocker issues

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [CORE] RC1 blocker issues
Date: 2006-11-24 20:36:48
Message-ID: 200611242136.49819.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> * Brendan Jurd's recent report about from_char/to_char not being
> consistent about 'D':
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-11/msg00226.php
> Is this a bug? If so I think we should fix it now.

Should be fixed, unless someone with Oracle can show that it is
intentional.

> * the to_char month/day name localization issue. Consensus at the
> moment seems to be that we should revert the last-minute patch.

Leave for 8.3.

> * possible rearrangement of pg_stat column order:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-11/msg00643.php
> Should we do this, and if so should we force initdb (via a catversion
> change)? I'm currently leaning to the thought that if we change it
> we should force initdb, else we'll risk having a noticeable
> user-visible difference between different "8.2" installations.

Fix and initdb.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2006-11-24 20:37:21 Re: RC1 blocker issues
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2006-11-24 19:50:27 Re: [Replica-hooks-discuss] Integrating Replication ino