Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Operator Classes and ANALYZE

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Rusty Conover <rconover(at)infogears(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Operator Classes and ANALYZE
Date: 2006-11-23 03:48:45
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 15:54 -0700, Rusty Conover wrote:
> > I still think this is a deficiency in the analyze function to not use  
> > the operator_class that the index uses when producing statistics for  
> > that index.
> Agreed, but that isn't the way it works right now, AFAICS. TODO...

Do people want this as a TODO?  What would the wording be?

  Bruce Momjian   bruce(at)momjian(dot)us

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-11-23 04:38:12
Subject: Re: global symbol conflict in
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-11-23 02:41:05
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Out of memory error causes Abort, Abort tries to allocate memory

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group