Re: Operator Classes and ANALYZE

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Rusty Conover <rconover(at)infogears(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Operator Classes and ANALYZE
Date: 2006-11-23 03:48:45
Message-ID: 200611230348.kAN3mja09385@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 15:54 -0700, Rusty Conover wrote:
>
> > I still think this is a deficiency in the analyze function to not use
> > the operator_class that the index uses when producing statistics for
> > that index.
>
> Agreed, but that isn't the way it works right now, AFAICS. TODO...

Do people want this as a TODO? What would the wording be?

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-11-23 04:38:12 Re: global symbol conflict in
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-11-23 02:41:05 Re: [BUGS] Out of memory error causes Abort, Abort tries to allocate memory