From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Molle Bestefich <molle(dot)bestefich(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: quick review |
Date: | 2006-11-21 21:34:50 |
Message-ID: | 200611212134.kALLYol02439@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> > > And when I mentioned that to two of my largest customers, they both
> > > looked at me like I had lost my mind.
> > >
> > > Something to think about.
> >
> > My assumption is that they are used to buggy software that has bugs
> > unfixed for years, and the repair tools are the answer to that, no?
> >
>
> Well I certainly can't argue with that :) but it is a really hard
> argument to make to the customer. These are customers who have spent
> many more times your and my salaries on software and needed these
> *repair* tools in the past.
OK, so do we give them a /bin/true and go away? How do we address this?
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-11-21 21:37:53 | Re: [PATCHES] replication docs: split single vs. |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-11-21 21:32:38 | Re: quick review |