Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com>, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition
Date: 2006-11-20 15:03:02
Message-ID: 200611201503.kAKF32U19682@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Jim,
>
> > That's true of simple query broadcasting (ie: pgpool), but not true ?
> > of Continuent/Sequoia. Continuent's software adds a lot of additional ?
> > features on top of simple query broadcasting, making it far more ?
> > robust than simply spewing queries out to every node in the cluster. ?
> > You still have to be very careful with how you use it, but not nearly ?
> > as much as with simpler solutions.
>
> I think the general term is "statement-based replication", not "broadcasting".

Well, the problem is that you can use a statement-based method to
replication from a master to a slave. I think MySQL used to use this
method, or still does, so I don't think the term "statement-based" is
clear enough, though I am open to other terms than "broadcast".

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-11-20 15:05:09 Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-11-20 15:01:45 Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-11-20 15:05:09 Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-11-20 15:01:45 Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition