Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Postgres server crash

From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>
To: "Craig A(dot) James" <cjames(at)modgraph-usa(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres server crash
Date: 2006-11-19 22:32:38
Message-ID: 20061119223236.GE2366@mathom.us (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 02:12:01PM -0800, Craig A. James wrote:
>And speaking of SGI, this very issue was among the things that sank the 
>company.  As the low-end graphics cards ate into their visualization 
>market, they tried to become an Oracle Server platform.  Their servers were 
>*fast*.  But they crashed -- a lot.  And memory-overcommit was one of the 
>reasons.  

You realize that it had to be turned on explicitly on IRIX, right? But 
don't let facts get in the way of a good rant...

Mike Stone

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Craig A. JamesDate: 2006-11-20 01:00:23
Subject: Re: Postgres server crash
Previous:From: Guido NeitzerDate: 2006-11-19 22:22:18
Subject: PostgreSQL with 64 bit was: Re: shared_buffers > 284263 on OS X

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group