Re: replication docs: split single vs. multi-master

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: replication docs: split single vs. multi-master
Date: 2006-11-16 21:50:31
Message-ID: 200611162150.kAGLoVa06062@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I didn't mention distributed shared memory as a separate item because I
> felt it was an implementation detail of clustering, rather than
> something separate. I kept two-phase in the cluster item for the same
> reason.
>
> Current version at:
>
> http://momjian.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/failover.html

I am now attaching the additional text I added based on your comments.
I have also changed the markup so all the solutions appear on the same
web page. I think seeing it all together might give us new ideas for
improvement.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

Attachment Content-Type Size
/rtmp/diff text/x-diff 2.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gurjeet Singh 2006-11-16 21:50:49 A suggestion on PG_TRY() exception handling code.
Previous Message Dwight Emmons 2006-11-16 21:47:01 Cast null to int4 upgrading from Version 7.2

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Schiltknecht 2006-11-16 22:02:46 Re: replication docs: split single vs. multi-master
Previous Message Dwight Emmons 2006-11-16 21:47:01 Cast null to int4 upgrading from Version 7.2