Re: Hundreds of database and FSM

From: "Steinar H(dot) Gunderson" <sgunderson(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: "Craig A(dot) James" <cjames(at)modgraph-usa(dot)com>,pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hundreds of database and FSM
Date: 2006-11-15 17:42:33
Message-ID: 20061115174233.GA22789@uio.no
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 02:31:45PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> This is based on our current 150 databases times 20 tables, or 3000 tables
>> total. But I wasn't sure if sequences count as "relations", which would
>> double the number.
> They don't because they don't have free space.

OTOH, indexes do.

/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig A. James 2006-11-16 02:20:24 Postgres server crash
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-11-15 17:31:45 Re: Hundreds of database and FSM