| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Michael Dean <mdean(at)sourceview(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, Michael Dean <michael(dot)dean(at)speakeasy(dot)net>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: On what we want to support: travel? |
| Date: | 2006-10-30 16:42:03 |
| Message-ID: | 200610301742.06117.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
Am Montag, 30. Oktober 2006 16:50 schrieb Michael Dean:
> Ad hoc decisions by an appointed committee that is reactive to
> indiosyncratic proposals seems somewhat unethical. Perhaps I am wrong,
> but wouldn't it be better if there were a document clearly specifying
> spending priorities that was relatively accepted by consensus of a broad
> group of pg'ers, and that an opportunity to qualify for these monies
> could be promulgated to the broader group?
That is the point of this discussion.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chander Ganesan | 2006-10-30 17:56:12 | Re: $ Contribution vs $ Matching Pledge |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-10-30 16:31:16 | Re: On what we want to support: travel? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2006-10-30 18:43:33 | Re: On what we want to support: travel? |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-10-30 16:31:16 | Re: On what we want to support: travel? |