Re: On what we want to support: travel?

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: On what we want to support: travel?
Date: 2006-10-26 22:26:45
Message-ID: 20061026222645.GP26892@nasby.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 12:25:46PM -0700, elein wrote:
> I also agree that infrastructure comes first, then travel and all else.

+1. We do ourselves a big dis-service every time a public-facing service
(ie: search) is down on isn't functioning as expected. Unfortunately,
this still seems to be a monthly occurence (though it's gotten a lot
better in the past year or two). I know money doesn't solve all
problems, but we need to make sure it's not causing them.
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-10-26 23:26:51 Re: On what we want to support: travel?
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2006-10-26 22:19:24 Re: On what we want to support: travel?

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-10-26 23:26:51 Re: On what we want to support: travel?
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2006-10-26 22:19:24 Re: On what we want to support: travel?