From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition |
Date: | 2006-10-26 15:55:36 |
Message-ID: | 20061026155535.GU26892@nasby.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:42:07PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > Something else worth doing though is to have a paragraph explaining why
> > there's no built-in replication. I don't have time to write something
> > right now, but I can do it later tonight if no one beats me to it.
>
> I thought that was implied in the early paragraph about why there are
> many solutions.
I think we should explicitely spell it out, especially considering how
many times people ask about it. How about...
This multitude of choices is why PostgreSQL does not ship with a
replication solution by default; any bundled solution would only
satisfy a subset of replication needs.
(sorry for the non-standard patch, but anoncvs isn't sync'd up yet).
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
patch | text/plain | 911 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-10-26 15:59:57 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-10-26 15:53:09 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-10-26 15:59:57 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-10-26 15:53:09 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition |