| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: create temp table .. on commit delete rows |
| Date: | 2006-10-12 22:32:50 |
| Message-ID: | 200610122232.k9CMWo522955@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > David Fetter wrote:
> >>> Should something notice and raise a warning when people create a
> >>> TEMP table and have AUTOCOMMIT on?
>
> > Added to TODO:
> > o Issue a notice if CREATE TABLE ... ON COMMIT { DELETE ROWS |
> > DROP } is issued outside a multi-statement transaction
>
> That is *not* what was suggested, and it doesn't seem very useful. The
> problem really comes when one uses a temp table in autocommit mode, not
> at creation time.
>
> The problem with the original suggestion is that the backend can't do it
> because AUTOCOMMIT is a notion that exists only in the client-side code.
> And the client can't do it very well because it'd have to parse SQL
> commands, and even with that it wouldn't see CREATE TEMP TABLE commands
> issued inside functions.
Ewe. Yea, I will just remove it. We can't issue a warning easily.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-10-12 22:37:44 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp 7.3.16. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-10-12 22:17:35 | Re: create temp table .. on commit delete rows |