On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:56:37PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> *ahem* nudge people to update the status of what they're working on once
> a month.
Well, though, remember that the point of this was supposed to be to
make things easier for the developers, who are already spending (it
would seem) too many cycles keeping on top of this. Or maybe I just
misunderstood what the problem was people were having.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
Users never remark, "Wow, this software may be buggy and hard
to use, but at least there is a lot of code underneath."
--Damien Katz