Re: On future conferences

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: Robert Bernier <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: On future conferences
Date: 2006-09-29 13:57:14
Message-ID: 20060929135714.GE22815@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 09:39:14AM -0400, Robert Bernier wrote:

> Increasing the number of conference goers makes it possible to
> defray costs directly from conference itself thus relying less upon
> the sponsors.

Well, maybe. That's really a matter of income from the number of
attendees.

> Were you able to cover these issues from those other people who've
> run their own conferences?

Yes. We looked at many models, and this was the one we came up with.
Other models might work differently.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
"The year's penultimate month" is not in truth a good way of saying
November.
--H.W. Fowler

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mdean 2006-09-29 15:46:17 Re: On future conferences
Previous Message Robert Bernier 2006-09-29 13:39:14 Re: On future conferences