Re: Sane error messages for SSL retry cases

On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 02:18:59PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> at the error string is of course not localization-proof, so we'd have to
> break down that errcode into some more-specific categories. Which is
> probably not a bad idea anyway, but it would mean that the nicer
> behavior would only happen when talking to an 8.2 or later server.
>
> Thoughts? Is this something to tackle during beta, or must we put it
> off till 8.3?

It sounds to me like a very nice idea that has to wait for the next
cycle. Just getting agreement on the categories will take time and
cycles, no?

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
When my information changes, I alter my conclusions. What do you do sir?
--attr. John Maynard Keynes