Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i
Date: 2006-09-24 08:20:22
Message-ID: 200609241020.23452.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On the other hand, I don't understand why DocBook would be Latin-1
> only. What would be the point of that limitation? Some googling
> seems to reveal that people indeed uses other charsets, UTF-8 in
> particular (but also Big5, Latin-2, etc), so apparently this isn't
> set in stone. (I admit that they mainly talk about XML Docbook
> though).

DocBook SGML is Latin 1; DocBook XML, like all XML, is UCS-4.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2006-09-24 12:49:37 Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i
Previous Message User Dpage 2006-09-23 22:44:22 pginstaller - pginst: Correct some text while I think of it.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2006-09-24 10:51:49 Re: Buildfarm alarms
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2006-09-24 06:13:51 Re: PostgreSQL 8.2beta1 w/ VALUES