Re: guc comment changes (was Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>
Subject: Re: guc comment changes (was Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta)
Date: 2006-09-18 11:13:45
Message-ID: 200609181313.46182.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Am Freitag, 15. September 2006 20:32 schrieb Tom Lane:
> I've finally taken a close look at this patch, and I don't like it any
> more than Peter does. The refactoring might or might not be good at its
> core, but as presented it is horrid.

Joachim Wieland is in the process of reworking the original feature patch
(resetting commented out parameters) in a much more compact form. But it
turns out that there are a couple of very tricky situations involving custom
variables, which may need more discussion than we have time for now.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-09-18 11:20:01 Re: Opinion about macro for the uuid datatype.
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2006-09-18 10:45:21 Re: 8.2 beta blockers