Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Subject: Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta
Date: 2006-09-03 19:54:06
Message-ID: 200609032154.07558.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Without a reply from Peter, I have to assume the patch is valid.

To make it more explicit: I think the patch is stupid, but if someone
wants to review it, go ahead. But I am not comfortable with the "if no
one objects, I'll just commit it" mode that is sometimes going on. Has
anyone actually tested the patch?

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2006-09-03 20:56:51 Re: Optimizing prepared statements
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-09-03 19:41:43 Re: @ versus ~, redux