| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add new variable |
| Date: | 2006-09-02 17:08:19 |
| Message-ID: | 200609021708.k82H8Jh29442@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> I'd be less unhappy with this patch if the variable were not marked
> GUC_REPORT. That is what gives it nontrivial cost: it's adding a couple
> dozen bytes to every connection startup exchange, for data that's 100%
> redundant with data already being transmitted.
>
> The arguments that were made in favor of this patch cited its possible
> use in SQL scripts, but there is no need for the variable to be marked
> GUC_REPORT for that usage.
GUC_REPORT removed.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-09-02 17:10:17 | pgsql: Revert as not needed/inconsistent with SQL REINDEX: Suppress |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-09-02 17:08:10 | pgsql: Remove GUC_REPORT for new "server_version_num" GUC variable. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lukas Kahwe Smith | 2006-09-02 17:09:42 | Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-09-02 17:06:28 | Re: pgstattuple extension for indexes |