From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, chrisnospam(at)1006(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets |
Date: | 2006-08-28 23:08:07 |
Message-ID: | 200608282308.k7SN87317504@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> Wait a minute. What I thought we had agreed to was a patch to make
> >>> commands sent with \g use a cursor.
>
> > I am confused. I assume \g and ; should be affected, like Peter says.
> > Tom, what *every* command are you talking about? You mean \d?
>
> Like I said, I thought we were intending to modify \g's behavior only;
> that was certainly the implication of the discussion of "\gc".
OK, got it. I just don't see the value to doing \g and not ;. I think
the \gc case was a hack when he didn't have \set. Now that we have
\set, we should be consistent.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-28 23:18:37 | Re: autovacuum causing numerous regression-test failures |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-28 23:06:38 | Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets in psql using cursors |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-28 23:20:57 | Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-28 23:06:38 | Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets in psql using cursors |