From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, chrisnospam(at)1006(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets in psql using cursors |
Date: | 2006-08-28 23:06:38 |
Message-ID: | 19725.1156806398@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Wait a minute. What I thought we had agreed to was a patch to make
>>> commands sent with \g use a cursor.
> I am confused. I assume \g and ; should be affected, like Peter says.
> Tom, what *every* command are you talking about? You mean \d?
Like I said, I thought we were intending to modify \g's behavior only;
that was certainly the implication of the discussion of "\gc".
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-28 23:08:07 | Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-28 22:54:13 | Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-28 23:08:07 | Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-28 22:54:13 | Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets |