Re: autovacuum causing numerous regression-test failures

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: autovacuum causing numerous regression-test failures
Date: 2006-08-28 22:13:35
Message-ID: 20060828221335.GC13899@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 15:21 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > We have more than enough problems to fix for 8.2 already. Let's
> > try to do this early in the 8.3 cycle instead.
>
> I agree -- I think this is exactly the sort of change that is best made
> at the beginning of a development cycle, so that there's a whole cycle's
> worth of testing to ensure it plays nicely with the rest of the system.

On the other hand, the bug Tom found on DROP OWNED a couple of weeks ago
was introduced right at the start of this development cycle, which tells
us that our testing of the development branch is not very exhaustive.
But I agree anyway.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-08-28 22:16:01 Re: Rtree circle ops
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-08-28 22:09:06 Re: [PATCHES] updated patch for selecting large results sets in