Re: LWN on Pervasive

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LWN on Pervasive
Date: 2006-08-26 23:01:08
Message-ID: 20060826230108.GC3636@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 05:14:19PM -0500, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On Aug 20, 2006, at 7:23 PM, Neil Conway wrote:
> >In case anyone hasn't seen it already, LWN recently published two
> >editorials on the Pervasive announcement and on "The PostgreSQL
> >business" in general:
> >
> >http://lwn.net/Articles/193740/
> >http://lwn.net/Articles/194561/
>
> I like how he wrote the first article without doing any research and
> then used the second to wipe some egg off his face. :)

Only some of it. He's still missing all the businesses that sliced
huge hunks off their development and maintenance costs by using
PostgreSQL.

Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666
Skype: davidfetter

Remember to vote!

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Anton de Wet 2006-08-28 08:58:51 Training Courses
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2006-08-26 22:14:19 Re: LWN on Pervasive