| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New XML section for documentation |
| Date: | 2006-08-26 18:41:32 |
| Message-ID: | 200608262041.33396.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I made it clear in the section that the XML syntax was being checked,
> not validation against a schema. You want Check and Validation
> sections?
"Valid" and "well-formed" have very specific distinct meanings in XML.
(Note that "check" doesn't have any meaning there.) We will eventually
want a method to verify both the validity and the well-formedness.
I think that a function called xml_valid checks for well-formedness is
an outright bug and needs to be fixed.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-08-26 18:42:35 | Re: [HACKERS] New XML section for documentation |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-08-26 18:38:43 | Re: [HACKERS] New XML section for documentation |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-08-26 18:42:35 | Re: [HACKERS] New XML section for documentation |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-08-26 18:38:43 | Re: [HACKERS] New XML section for documentation |