Re: Autovacuum on by default?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Autovacuum on by default?
Date: 2006-08-18 12:08:48
Message-ID: 200608181408.49426.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Am Donnerstag, 17. August 2006 18:40 schrieb Josh Berkus:
> I'm in favor of this, but do we want to turn on vacuum_delay by default
> as well?

People might complain that suddenly their vacuum runs take four times as long
(or whatever). Of course, if we turn on autovacuum and advocate a more or
less hands-off vacuum policy, they won't have to care either way. All of
this would certainly be release-notes material.

Does anyone, for that matter, want to propose possible default parameters for
vacuum_delay?

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2006-08-18 12:33:58 Re: Bug with initDB under windows 2003
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2006-08-18 11:49:06 Re: pg_regress in C