Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)is(dot)rice(dot)edu>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
Date: 2006-08-17 05:31:21
Message-ID: 200608170731.23681.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> What we are talking about here is bug triage.

I think we are actually talking about bug *tracking*.

> One sensible way to do this would be to have a group of suitably
> qualified volunteers who could perform this function on a roster
> basis, for, say, a week or a two at a time.

Organising a roster, a rotating roster at that, is probably the single
most difficult thing you can do in this group. :-)

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-08-17 05:36:37 Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-08-17 05:29:18 Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)