| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)is(dot)rice(dot)edu>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) |
| Date: | 2006-08-16 12:10:06 |
| Message-ID: | 200608160810.07891.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday 16 August 2006 00:52, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > that the bug tracker would have to have a reasonable "output" email
> > capability, but I'd not necessarily insist on being able to "input"
> > to it by mail. Red Hat's present bugzilla system could be described
> > that way --- and while I can't say I'm in love with it, I can deal
> > with it.
>
> Bugzilla is good in that you need to sign up to report anything (or at
> least it can be configured that way, not sure), which might reduce the
> amount of noise. The other systems that have been mentioned have by
> design little or no barrier of entry, which doesn't seem to be what we
> want.
I'm not sure I follow this, since currently anyone can email the bugs list or
use the bugs -> email form from the website. Are you looking to increase the
barrier for bug reporting?
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-08-16 12:28:53 | Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) |
| Previous Message | Volkan YAZICI | 2006-08-16 12:09:14 | "cache reference leak" and "problem in alloc set" warnings |