Re: Beginner optimization questions, esp. regarding

From: Frank Wiles <frank(at)wiles(dot)org>
To: "Carl Youngblood" <carl(at)youngbloods(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Beginner optimization questions, esp. regarding
Date: 2006-08-15 19:08:06
Message-ID: 20060815140806.8c73ef5f.frank@wiles.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:47:54 -0600
"Carl Youngblood" <carl(at)youngbloods(dot)org> wrote:

> I tried setting it to 2GB and postgres wouldn't start. Didn't
> investigate in much greater detail as to why it wouldn't start, but
> after switching it back to 1GB it started fine.
>
> On 8/15/06, Jim C. Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> wrote:
> > See the recent thread about how old rules of thumb for
> > shared_buffers are now completely bunk. With 4G of memory, setting
> > shared_buffers to 2G could easily be reasonable. The OP really
> > needs to test several different values with their actual workload
> > and see what works best.

Sounds like you need to increase your kernel's maximum amount
of shared memory. This is typically why an increase in
shared_buffers causes PostgreSQL not to start.

Check out this page in the docs for more information:

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/kernel-resources.html

---------------------------------
Frank Wiles <frank(at)wiles(dot)org>
http://www.wiles.org
---------------------------------

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-08-15 19:15:05 Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and
Previous Message Michael Stone 2006-08-15 19:02:56 Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and