Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re:

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re:
Date: 2006-08-09 13:05:02
Message-ID: 200608091505.04383.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Am Freitag, 4. August 2006 04:50 schrieb Tom Lane:
> I'd like to see us refactor the docs as necessary to reflect that idea.
> Peter is right that this needs some discussion in syntax.sgml as well as
> in the reference pages --- but I'm still not very clear on how the
> presentation should go.

I'm beginning to think that VALUES might be a separate command after all.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heejin Mun 2006-08-09 15:03:27 During compiling sgml files, there is a error message...
Previous Message Bill Moran 2006-08-09 13:00:31 Re: unsubscribe

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-08-09 13:15:36 Re: 8.2 features status
Previous Message Bill Moran 2006-08-09 13:00:31 Re: unsubscribe

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2006-08-09 13:52:25 Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2006-08-09 11:56:04 Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived