| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Lukas Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 8.2 features status |
| Date: | 2006-08-08 05:28:59 |
| Message-ID: | 200608080528.k785Sx225369@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> > The fact is, the existing system worked as it should, though it is often
> > invisible. We didn't get all the features we wanted, but that isn't
> > because the system isn't working.
>
> Well that kind of comes back to my point of better communication.
> Perhaps a lot of this discussion could have been avoided if the TODO had
> been more... proactive?
>
> For example:
>
> Make postmater and postgres options distinct so the postmaster -o
> option is no longer needed | PeterE | Confirmed for 8.2 | 07/20/06
We could do that, but once an item is done I don't see the point in
having the date and person's name. You are right that is clearly a
different purpose from the TODO list, and if someone wants to track
that, it might help things.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Florian G. Pflug | 2006-08-08 08:17:18 | Re: "Constraint exclusion" is not general enough |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-08 05:04:02 | Re: 8.2 features status |