Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] log_statement output for protocol

Tom Lane wrote:
> Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> writes:
> > A 50-parameter query could be .. interesting ..
>
> > I realize that you need this level of output to reflect what is
> > happening at the protocol level, but seeing all the protocol detail is
> > not really what you expect when you turn on basic statement logging, is it?
>
> Well, we've certainly been beat up often enough about the lack of
> logging bind parameter values --- I don't think there's any question
> about the importance of printing them. I agree that the proposed format
> is much too verbose though. In particular, a separate LOG message per
> parameter is NOT what I had in mind; I want them in DETAIL lines of the
> bind log message. (This'd perhaps also address Oliver's issue, since
> if you didn't want to see the values you could turn down
> log_error_verbosity.)

OK, I will continue in that direction. Will post a new patch.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +