Re: 8.2 features status

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.2 features status
Date: 2006-08-04 19:28:11
Message-ID: 20060804192811.GO40481@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 10:27:49AM -0700, Joe Conway wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> >"Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> writes:
> >
> >>UPDATE/DELETE for CE are a big deal - I really wish we had INSERT too,
> >
> >Huh? We had INSERT working before, that's why it's not mentioned.
>
> I think what Luke means, is that an INSERT into the base table of the
> inheritance hierarchy with CE enabled gets automagically inserted into
> the correct partition, and as far as I know that still doesn't happen --
> but I've certainly been wrong before :-).

Likewise, I suspect that the UPDATE/DELETE constraint elimination don't
do anything 'magical' either; merely figure out what partitions can
safely be ignored for a statement. While that's a good feature to have,
it's far short of being able to automatically 'route' data to the
correct partitions.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-08-04 19:30:31 Re: pg_upgrade (was: 8.2 features status)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-08-04 19:27:34 Re: PGStatement#setPrepareThreshold