| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>, Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com>, Postgres JDBC <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PGStatement#setPrepareThreshold |
| Date: | 2006-08-04 19:19:48 |
| Message-ID: | 200608041919.k74JJm728425@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc pgsql-patches |
Dave Cramer wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> Doesn't it make more sense to use the statement name ?
>
> If I prepare S_3 as "select * from foo"
>
> then the bind log is going to show me "select * from foo" not S_3
>
> I think in the case of named statements I'd prefer "S_3" however as I
> think about this in the case of unnamed statements I'd prefer the
> "select * from foo"
The bind shows:
(errmsg("statement: <protocol> <BIND> %s [PREPARE: %s]",
The first %s is the statement name, and the second %s is the query.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2006-08-04 19:26:03 | Re: 8.2 features status |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-04 19:18:37 | Re: 8.2 features status |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-04 19:27:34 | Re: PGStatement#setPrepareThreshold |
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2006-08-04 19:16:12 | Re: PGStatement#setPrepareThreshold |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-04 19:27:34 | Re: PGStatement#setPrepareThreshold |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-04 19:17:50 | Re: [PATCHES] extension for sql update |