Re: Hash indexes

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Gregory Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, Luke Lonergan <LLonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>, mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Jie Zhang <jzhang(at)greenplum(dot)com>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hash indexes
Date: 2006-08-01 16:49:55
Message-ID: 20060801164955.GM40481@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 10:54:10AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> This is now sounding like a lot of low hanging fruit ... highly
> performant hash indexed tables could possibly be a very big win.

So does someone want to 'take up the cause' for them?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-08-01 17:30:38 Re: GENERATED ... AS IDENTITY, Was: Re: Feature Freeze
Previous Message Zoltan Boszormenyi 2006-08-01 16:10:49 GENERATED ... AS IDENTITY, Was: Re: Feature Freeze