Re: DTrace enabled build fails

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Lor <Robert(dot)Lor(at)sun(dot)com>
Subject: Re: DTrace enabled build fails
Date: 2006-07-29 17:56:15
Message-ID: 200607291956.16442.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Does it not like static functions?
>
> I seem to recall Robert mentioning that they'd only recently fixed
> DTrace to cope with probes in static functions. Maybe you need to
> get an update?

That rings a bell. Can we get a more precise designation on what
version of DTrace we support? And where can one get that required
update?

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-07-29 18:31:07 Re: Formulating an sql query with CTID
Previous Message Sergey E. Koposov 2006-07-29 17:51:31 Re: Do we need multiple forms of the SQL2003 statistics