Re: Anyone looking to be completed for 8.2?

You need to send it as a patch to pgsql-patches for code review. Include a
description of what it is and pointers on how to use it. Also make note that
you think it should be added to contrib with reasons why. You also need to
do this pretty much today... code freeze is Aug 1, so if something isnt seen
before then, it's not likely to get in.

Robert Treat

On Saturday 29 July 2006 08:06, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
> Practically i moved it to beta.
> I am still left to document the code better and perhaps improve
> the error messages and clean some code fragments but it is finished
> feature wise and i've done a lot of testing on it.
> Do you need anything from me to put it in contrib or you copy it
> directly from pgfoundry?
>
> On Saturday 29 July 2006 02:35, Jim Nasby wrote:
> > Sorry for the noise, but I haven't seen this on -patches. Is it in
> > now? Should we be extending feature freeze?
> >
> > On Jul 15, 2006, at 7:33 PM, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
> > > My project is doing what it should do. Still missing one feature i
> > > want to
> > > enter before people will start to use it but other than that i
> > > tested it
> > > extensively. It can take a few days.
> > > still needs a lot of code clean ups and i need to move it from 8.1
> > > dynamic loaded function interface to 8.2
> > > but i am guessing it shouldn't be something difficult?
> > > The code cleanups and some more features will be finished by the end
> > > of soc.
> > >
> > > Is there anything else to do than just copying the files into contrib?
> > >
> > > Aside from the obvious full disjunction functionality i have a
> > > feeling people
> > > will benefit from the code itself as an example since it uses many
> > > aspects of
> > > postgresql.
> > >
> > > On Saturday 15 July 2006 22:50, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > >> SoC Mentors,
> > >>
> > >> Feature freeze is officially 2 weeks away. Just to check, are
> > >> there any
> > >> SoC projects which look to be both:
> > >>
> > >> a) generally applicable enough to be in 8.2, and
> > >> b) near-production quality by the end of SoC?
> > >>
> > >> We said at the beginning of SoC that we'd re-evaluate near feature
> > >> freeze
> > >> time if we wanted to wait for an SoC feature; is there anything?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Tzahi.
> > > --
> > > Tzahi Fadida
> > > Blog: http://tzahi.blogsite.org | Home Site: http://tzahi.webhop.info
> > > WARNING TO SPAMMERS: see at
> > > http://members.lycos.co.uk/my2nis/spamwarning.html
> > >
> > > ---------------------------(end of
> > > broadcast)---------------------------
> > > TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> > >
> > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
> >
> > --
> > Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
> > Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
> > vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> > choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> > match

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL