Re: [HACKERS] pg_regress breaks on msys

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hiroshi Saito <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_regress breaks on msys
Date: 2006-07-29 02:26:08
Message-ID: 200607290226.k6T2Q8h02249@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> >> Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> The cases that I think we most need to defend against are
> >>> (A) diff program not found
>
> > In summary, on MinGW, files differ or 'diff' not found, returns 1. If
> > one of the files to be compared does not exist, it returns 2. And of
> > course, if the files are the same, it returns zero.
>
> OK. The problem here is that pg_regress is coded to assume that
> zero-length output file represents success. Given the above Windows
> behavior that is *clearly* not good enough, because that's probably
> exactly what we will see after diff-not-found (if the Windows shell
> acts like a Unix shell does and creates the ">" target first).
>
> I'd suggest modifying the logic so that zero-length output file with a
> nonzero return from the child be treated as a fatal condition (not just
> a difference, but bail out).

I modified pg_regress.c to use just the return code to determine if the
diff worked, but I added in a WIN32-specific test for the file size. I
think that is the cleanest solution. Attached.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

Attachment Content-Type Size
/pgpatches/wait text/x-diff 4.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-07-29 02:50:01 Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] [Fwd: RE: Build farm on Windows]
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-07-29 02:21:01 Re: The vacuum-ignore-vacuum patch

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-07-29 02:54:57 Re: Possible explanation for Win32 stats regression test
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-07-29 02:21:01 Re: The vacuum-ignore-vacuum patch