Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: A couple remarks on TODO

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: A couple remarks on TODO
Date: 2006-07-28 19:00:33
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Thanks, done.


Tom Lane wrote:
> TODO has an entry
> 	o Allow UPDATE to handle complex aggregates [update]?
> which I think is now obsolete, because we've settled on rejecting
> aggregates at the top level of UPDATE, as the spec tells us to do.
> Also, there's one remaining unfinished feature in the multi-argument
> aggregate patch, which I think we should have a TODO item for:
> 	* Allow DISTINCT to work in multiple-argument aggregate calls
> The SQL2003 spec doesn't require this (it forbids DISTINCT in all its
> two-argument aggregates) but it seems like we should do it someday
> for orthogonality's sake.
> 			regards, tom lane

  Bruce Momjian   bruce(at)momjian(dot)us

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-07-28 19:01:36
Subject: Re: Role incompatibilities
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-07-28 18:54:40
Subject: A couple remarks on TODO

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group