Re: A couple remarks on TODO

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: A couple remarks on TODO
Date: 2006-07-28 19:00:33
Message-ID: 200607281900.k6SJ0X927493@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Thanks, done.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> TODO has an entry
>
> o Allow UPDATE to handle complex aggregates [update]?
>
> which I think is now obsolete, because we've settled on rejecting
> aggregates at the top level of UPDATE, as the spec tells us to do.
>
> Also, there's one remaining unfinished feature in the multi-argument
> aggregate patch, which I think we should have a TODO item for:
>
> * Allow DISTINCT to work in multiple-argument aggregate calls
>
> The SQL2003 spec doesn't require this (it forbids DISTINCT in all its
> two-argument aggregates) but it seems like we should do it someday
> for orthogonality's sake.
>
> regards, tom lane

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-07-28 19:01:36 Re: Role incompatibilities
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-07-28 18:54:40 A couple remarks on TODO