Re: Adding a pgbench run to buildfarm

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: "Bort, Paul" <pbort(at)tmwsystems(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Adding a pgbench run to buildfarm
Date: 2006-07-25 17:59:59
Message-ID: 20060725175959.GA83250@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 11:52:14PM -0400, Bort, Paul wrote:
> -hackers,
>
> With help from Andrew Dunstan, I'm adding the ability to do a pgbench
> run after all of the other tests during a buildfarm run.
>
> Andrew said I should solicit opinions as to what parameters to use. A
> cursory search through the archives led me to pick a scaling factor of
> 10, 5 users, and 100 transactions. All of these will be adjustable using
> the build-farm.conf mechanism already in place.

Why is it being hard-coded? I think it makes a lot more sense to allow
pg_bench options to be specified in the buildfarm config. Even better
yet would be specifying them on the command line, which would allow
members to run a more rigorous test once a day/week (I'm thinking one
that might take 30 minutes, which could well ferret out some issues that
a simple 5 minute test won't).
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-07-25 18:02:31 Re: Resurrecting per-page cleaner for btree
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-07-25 17:49:18 Re: On-disk bitmap index patch