effective_cache_size is a real?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: effective_cache_size is a real?
Date: 2006-07-24 20:55:11
Message-ID: 200607242255.11355.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Is it intentional that effective_cache_size is a real (as opposed to
integer)? The initial revision of guc.c already has it that way, so it
was probably blindly adapted from the previous adhockery that had all
planner variables be doubles.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Lor 2006-07-24 21:00:46 Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-07-24 20:48:43 Re: Better name/syntax for "online" index creation