| From: | Enver ALTIN <ealtin(at)parkyeri(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | moises <moises(at)cedaivc(dot)co(dot)cu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Transaction Speed |
| Date: | 2006-07-21 08:11:17 |
| Message-ID: | 20060721081117.GG21070@alfa147 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 02:36:53PM +0200, moises wrote:
> For example Inserts, Update, delete, etc.
If you need a storage for structured data, database servers are good to
go. If you need a very fast "flow" of not-so-needed and
okay-to-miss-we-can-regenerate type of data storage you can go with
in-memory storage such as memcache[1] or PostgreSQL's temporary
table[2] feature. I think the latter would slightly perform better.
Enjoy,
[1] http://www.danga.com/memcached/
[2] http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/sql-createtable.html
--
Enver
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2006-07-21 09:39:56 | BF Failure on Bandicoot |
| Previous Message | Robert Lor | 2006-07-21 07:56:56 | Re: Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL |