Re: url for TODO item, is it right?

From: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
To: Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: url for TODO item, is it right?
Date: 2006-07-17 05:35:58
Message-ID: 20060717053558.GA87861@winnie.fuhr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 12:25:09AM -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> when searching the TODO list
> (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.TODO.html)
>
> i found this on the Monitoring section:
>
> o Allow protocol-level BIND parameter values to be logged
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-02/msg00165.php
>
> But i don't understand why that thread is related to the TODO item,
> i'm missing something?

Possibly the message renumbering that Tom griped about:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-www/2006-07/msg00061.php

--
Michael Fuhr

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-07-17 05:58:40 Re: url for TODO item, is it right?
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2006-07-17 05:25:09 url for TODO item, is it right?