| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze |
| Date: | 2006-07-11 21:43:16 |
| Message-ID: | 20060711184218.X957@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Josh Berkus wrote:
> I disagree. One of the things I'm asked by every single tech market
> analyst, after replication & clustering, is whether we have support for
> procedural Java. So it's something large-scale users want. If PL/Tcl
> belongs in the back end, then so does PL/Java.
There should be a Procedural Language section on pgfoundry for all of the
PLs, IMHO, and a README in contrib within core that points to it
(README.procedural_languages, if nothing else) ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2006-07-11 21:45:55 | Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-11 21:31:04 | Re: Implied Functional Index use |