Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se>
Subject: Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze
Date: 2006-07-11 20:42:45
Message-ID: 200607111342.46377.jd@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tuesday 11 July 2006 09:59, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> >> 5. I'll need committer rights to the PL/Java part in order to maintain
> >> it.
> >
> > Does our CVS setup cater for seggregated rights like this? Or would that
> > be done on a trust basis?
>
> No, and yes. However, I don't have a problem with giving Thomas
> committer access --- I'm just dubious about having PL/Java in the
> core distro at all.

Personally I would like to see in core, but it is not from a technical
perspective. It is purely from a marketing perspective (doubt that carries
much weight here ;)).

Having pl/Java helps PostgreSQL in the minds of all those tie wearing decision
making freaks... and before you say it, No. I do not wear a tie.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-07-11 20:49:04 Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2006-07-11 20:41:42 Re: More nuclear options