Re: Client build of MSVC6+ patch

Patch applied. Change made so test is WIN32, and add comment about
different structure ordering on Win32 for IPv6 use.

Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hiroshi Saito wrote:
> Hi. Tom-san.
>
> Oops, I understood it. Thank you for suggestion.
> What condition is this?
>
> Regards,
> Hiroshi Saito
>
> From: "Tom Lane"
>
> > "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp> writes:
> >>> Why do we need to reorder the fields in the struct?
> >
> >> Eh? Even my FreeBSD used well shows a structure object.
> >
> > The standard lists the fields in the other order:
> > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/netdb.h.html
> >
> > Even though the standard doesn't say that that has to be the physical
> > order, every other platform besides Windows does it that way. The patch
> > as given is unacceptable because it *will* break other platforms (mine
> > for instance ;-)). If it has to be this way for Windows then we need
> > some sort of platform-specific #ifdef. Considering that the code works
> > as-is on several sorts of Windows builds, we probably need something
> > even more specific than that, like #if MSVC-before-version-XX.
> >
> > regards, tom lane

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +