Re: PostgreSQL and success of OSS

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Brent Wilkins <wilkins(at)cs(dot)colostate(dot)edu>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and success of OSS
Date: 2006-06-29 15:20:35
Message-ID: 200606291120.36254.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Wednesday 28 June 2006 16:20, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Marc,
>
> >    The one that I can try and answer is the Developer Team Size, which
> > is a # that is very hard to arrive at .. the 'clearly defined
> > developers' are all listed at:
>
> I stick with Greg's estimate of "about 200" that he did for 7.4. That
> included:
>
> core contributors
> minor patch submitters
> beta testers (the ones who submitted bug fixes)
> key contributors to closely associated projects (like JDBC, ODBC, and
> OpenFTS)
>
> It was a lot of research on his part which is why I don't want to do it
> again.

I wonder if that number would need to be bumped up in a rather handwavy manner
(amybe +50) on the grounds of companies like enterprisedb, fujitsu,
greenplum, and sun, which I would guess have developers working behind the
scenes on issues thier companies care most about, which then get filtered up
through a few individuals to the community at large. Additionally we also
have more "closely tied" projects like slony and npgsql to draw in more
people. Thoughts?

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2006-06-29 18:24:23 Re: PostgreSQL and success of OSS
Previous Message David Fetter 2006-06-28 20:26:39 Re: PostgreSQL and success of OSS