| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>, Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Table clustering idea |
| Date: | 2006-06-28 03:46:40 |
| Message-ID: | 200606272046.40473.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jim,
> I know there were discussions in the past, though as per usual I can't
> find them in the archives.
Search on "B-Tree Organized Tables".
From what I can find, this feature isn't prohibitively useless. It's just a
singnificant amount of effort for a result which is a tradeoff. That is,
you'd *only* want to use it on tables which are *always* accessed by their
primary key.
What stopped the features AFAICT is that the interested parties weren't up to
doing the code.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-06-28 03:47:45 | Page format changes for 8.2? |
| Previous Message | tju tju | 2006-06-28 03:40:45 |